ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of amiodarone and propafenone in the treatment of chron-ic atrial fibrillation cardioversion. METHODS:60 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation cardioversion were randomly divided into propafenone group and amiodarone group. All patients were given conventional treatment,including treating primary disease,con-trolling symptoms,orally giving aspirin,intravenous infusion of GIK,monitoring heart rate,QT interval,P-R interval,QRS time,serum potassium and serum magnesium,etc. On this basis,propafenone group was orally given propafenone 450 mg for con-tinuous 3 months,3 times a day,and then the dose was decreased to 300 mg to maintain the sinus rhythm;amiodarone group was orally given amiodarone 200 mg for continuous 7 d a month,twice a day,and then the dose was decreased to 200 mg or 100 mg to maintain the sinus rhythm. The clinic data in 2 groups was observed,including clinical efficacy,simple drug cardioversion,elec-trical cardioversion,electrical cardioversion power,hospitalization time and incidence of adverse reactions,and the recurrence rate in 48 months was followed up. RESULTS:There were no significant differences in the clinical efficacy,simple drug cardiover-sion,electrical cardioversion,electrical cardioversion power,hospitalization time,incidence of adverse reactions and recurrence rate between 2 groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Based on the conventinal treatment,amiodarone and propafenone have similar clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation cardioversion,and both of them can be used as the conven-tional drugs for treating chronic atrial fibrillation cardioversion.